Inflated asset prices, investor complacency and brewing crisis that could trip up the current happy equilibrium are the backdrop for Axel Merk’s warning that it is time for investors to start “taking chips off the table.”
But the key difficulty for the Merk Investments founder and portfolio manager in his latest investment analysis is where to hide in an environment in which “instability may be the new normal.”
To answer that question, Merk first locates tracks the market’s current state as one of complacency — which is the third of three states in a market crisis.
Typically, he says, equity markets sell off in a crisis; as that crisis evolves, markets tend to differentiate: For example, when Cyprus blew up, Spanish bonds were undisturbed. In the third and current stage of a crisis, risk seems manageable.
“When a Portuguese company didn’t pay its loans on time, the markets barely blinked,” Merk writes.
It is at this stage that pundits typically advise not to sell but rather to buy the dips.
And this approach is vindicated by central bank easy-money policies that have the effect of compressing risk premiums.
European Central Bank chief “Mario Draghi has promised to do ‘whatever it takes.’ So why shouldn’t investors chase yields in the weaker Eurozone countries?” Merk asks.
The currency portfolio manager similarly critiques Fed chair Janet Yellen, whom he assesses as having “all but promised … to be late in raising rates.” What’s more, he thinks any nominal rate increases will be meaningless, because of inflation, such that he expects real rates to remain the same.
The trouble lurking in this low rate, high complacency environment is the danger that risk premia will suddenly and unexpectedly rise.
And while the source of this shift could be as subtle as a change of perception (“the glass is suddenly half empty”) or a result of the Fed seeking to engineer an exit, Merk devotes much of his analysis to growing social and geopolitical disorder.
In the social sphere, central bank easy-money policies are destroying society’s social fabric because asset holders are benefiting disproportionately, thus enlarging the wealth gap.
“I would argue policies of the Fed have a far greater impact on wealth distribution than the policies of Republicans or Democrats,” writes Merk. “Those that know how to deal with easy money, such as hedge funds, can do great in this environment; however, those that don’t know how to deal with debt easily fall through the cracks, unable to recover.”
The result is a deep erosion in purchasing power that fuels populist movements such as the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street; Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s populist policies; uprisings in the Middle East; and the ascendency of populist parties in Europe of late.
In this light, Ukraine’s essential problem is its inability to balance its books, thus turning initially to Russia and now to the European Union for subsidies.
Noting that World War II was preceded by the Great Depression, Merk says that “the aftermath of a credit bust is a fertile environment for the sort of dynamics that can lead to armed conflict. Russia has an interest in an unstable Ukraine; Japan might ramp up military spending to boost domestic growth, to name but two sources of instability.”
While not predicting World War III, Merk continues that “the U.S., a superpower no longer able to finance all of its commitments, is not exactly a source of stability, either: the biggest threat to U.S. national security may not be China or Russia, it’s the national debt.”
Merk is pessimistic about the possibility of dealing with the debt through entitlement reform in an environment of rising populism, for which reason he is convinced that real rates will have to remain low lest U.S. debt servicing costs rise by $1 trillion or more a year with a rise in rates.
So with asset prices at or near record levels and volatility at record lows, combined with rising world and domestic instability, investors should try to steer their portfolios away from risk.
Merk thinks bonds will be among the worst performers in the coming decade, and besides, are too risky to short because of the requirement to pay interest; he does not see the dollar as a safe haven with real interest rates in negative territory; and buying equities now means coming “late to the party.”
Investing in gold makes sense, he says, “as low to negative real interest rates may make the shiny metal that pays no interest (but cannot be easily ‘printed’) a formidable asset.”
Investors might also “diversify to baskets of currerncies” and “possibly be tactical in an effort to stay a step ahead as currency wars may be raging.”
---
Related on ThinkAdvisor:
Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images The top dog in this generation of video game consoles continues to pad its lead. Sony (SNE) revealed last week that it has sold 10 million PlayStation 4 systems since hitting the market nine months ago. Microsoft (MSFT) has yet to respond, but the latest data out of industry tracker NPD shows that the PS4 was once again the country's best selling system in July. The last time we got comparable data it wasn't even close. Ahead of June's E3 gamer conference, Sony announced that it had sold 7 million PS4s. Microsoft countered by revealing that it had sold 5 million Xbox One consoles to retailers. This wasn't a difference of 2 million boxes. Sony's figure was for devices that had made it all the way into the hands of gamers, while Microsoft's tally included all of the systems collecting dust on store shelves. Technology blog Extreme Tech estimates that Microsoft has sold just half as many of the current generation consoles to consumers as Sony at this point. Add it up, and it's not too shabby. Few figured that the Xbox One and PS4 -- released just a week apart last November -- would have sold a combined 15 million right now. And 5 million XBox Ones is nothing to sneeze at. This doesn't mean that Microsoft can rest easy. It's in a bind. History hasn't been kind to former market leaders that fail to keep up in future generations. If you need proof, just think about what Atari, 3DO and Sega are doing on the console front these days. Gamers are noticing the shift in dominance. Investors will have to follow suit. There Are No Cheat Codes "History has shown us that the first company to reach 10 million in console sales wins the generation battle," is a quote that may come to haunt Microsoft. Those words were spoekn in 2008 by then-Xbox head Don Mattrick when the Xbox 360 beat the PS4 to that meaty milestone. It should be said that the Xbox 360 came out a year before the PS4. It also didn't help that the PS3 hit the market as the priciest of the three systems at the time, setting gamers back as much as $599 in its 2006 debut. Sony learned its lesson. It made sure that it hit the market at a lower price than Microsoft this round. When Microsoft announced last year that it would hit the market at $499, Sony revealed that it would price its device at $399. When Microsoft infuriated gamers by suggesting that it would incorporate some software protective features, Sony cashed in by poking fun of the measures that Microsoft eventually abandoned. The same Sony that gamers hated two years ago when its online gaming network was hacked has suddenly become the rock star in the eyes and controller-clutching grips of diehard gamers. Investors thought that this would be a close race, but folks who play the games and follow the industry knew that PS4 was going to have the early lead in this generation. Microsoft's losing, and it doesn't have a lot of time to catch up. Game On Microsoft has gone from trying to please software developers last summer to trying to woo players this summer. It rolled out a new Xbox One that matches the PS4 at its $399 price point, forgoing the Kinect motion-based camera controller. This upset developers that were making games under the assumption that Kinect would be available to all players, but the gamble seemed to initially pay off when Microsoft announced that Xbox One sales tripled after the pricing move. However, as long as Sony has the lead -- and NPD's data shows that PS4's lead is only widening this summer -- this could lead to bigger headaches for Microsoft. A console needs developers, and game makers aren't going to spend as much time working on titles to serve an estimated 5 million Xbox One players when that same time and effort can be used to target Sony's much larger audience of PS4 owners. Microsoft has several games that are exclusive to the Xbox One, but it's also not a surprise to see that last month's best-selling game -- "The Last of Us Remastered" -- is a PlayStation exclusive. Sony is making sure that it doesn't take anything for granted. At E3 two months ago, it introduced a cloud-based game streaming service called PlayStation Now and entered the set-top media player market with PlayStation TV. Microsoft, on the other hand, continues to reel backwards. Last year's dreams of making the Xbox One the centerpiece of today's home theater haven't played out, and now it's closing the entertainment studio that was going to deliver original video streaming content. Microsoft is back to trying to market its Xbox One as a machine for gamers, but with 10 million early adopters already choosing its longtime rival, it's not going to be easy to stand out. More from Rick Aristotle Munarriz